The political entity termed a “state” is one context within which a mandate can be issued. Some scholars have referred to a “state” as a system of domination. Max Weber referred to a political state as “a relation of men dominating men.” Such a “state” cannot exist, he said, unless the people who are being dominated submit themselves to the authority claimed by the powers that be.-Steven M.(Author)
Ok, I have a question, “a mandate cannot exist unless the non dominant power has to submit to the dominant power?” (Sounds like Illuminati sex games…there is said it.)
Who says how much power or control a person has? And don’t say the president. Then we live in a socialist republic.
Is that really one persons defining moment, Max Weber?!?!
Then, we can appoint a person for the people, NOT the president, a person we want to really represent the people, put him in power to do our negotiating with the president, to establish a welfare system for US, for US(not United States, as we are never united) AND OUR FUTURE! THE CHILDREN FOR THEIR WELL BEING AND FOR ALL AMERICANS!
This is as bad as Tedros saying, if the US pulls out of the WHO, we are going to hurt the lives of scientists and their work!?!?
Really? Sheer stupidity, we have come this far, but how far have we really come?
Great application of the 'domination translator' to current events! The domination was in the mandates and in the prohibition of questioning and discussion (which are the basis of actual science).
BRAVO for your steadfast courage in speaking Truth...and in 'piercing the veil' of darkness and vaporizing it, exposing the shadowy darkness that operates in secrecy, up until now.
I always learn from your writings Steve, but want to quibble a bit about the preamble as a minimum requirement for a measure of “legitimacy.” The first draft of the preamble appears in James Wilson’s handwriting and he would certainly have approved of such a construction but he also took it for granted that to be legitimate any American government had to be bound under the law of nations—as he understood that law in other words as having to conform to the laws of nature and of Nature’s God—to respect the equal rights in accordance with the law of all peoples—including explicitly the peoples of the Native Nations over whom he said the United States has “no right.” I think it is that understanding that is necessary for there to be even a minimal claim to legitimacy. I think even that is inadequate as the true unwritten constitution of this land, in my opinion, is constituted by the international laws and usages that have been part of living with the land since millennia before the eurochristian invaders arrived and which the American people are bound to recognize and respect simply by virtue of living on Turtle Island. I realize that this position places me in something of a minority in American politics but I think there are more severe problems with any other approach with which I am familiar.
I was just talking to someone who about the fact checkers always say, “No…this or that didn’t happen or isn’t the case” but then they just parade an assertion usually with no evidence of their story about what is the case. It is an information gestapo and in other countries under cybersecurity measures people are being jailed and abused.
The political entity termed a “state” is one context within which a mandate can be issued. Some scholars have referred to a “state” as a system of domination. Max Weber referred to a political state as “a relation of men dominating men.” Such a “state” cannot exist, he said, unless the people who are being dominated submit themselves to the authority claimed by the powers that be.-Steven M.(Author)
Ok, I have a question, “a mandate cannot exist unless the non dominant power has to submit to the dominant power?” (Sounds like Illuminati sex games…there is said it.)
Who says how much power or control a person has? And don’t say the president. Then we live in a socialist republic.
Is that really one persons defining moment, Max Weber?!?!
Then, we can appoint a person for the people, NOT the president, a person we want to really represent the people, put him in power to do our negotiating with the president, to establish a welfare system for US, for US(not United States, as we are never united) AND OUR FUTURE! THE CHILDREN FOR THEIR WELL BEING AND FOR ALL AMERICANS!
This is as bad as Tedros saying, if the US pulls out of the WHO, we are going to hurt the lives of scientists and their work!?!?
Really? Sheer stupidity, we have come this far, but how far have we really come?
It sounds like the senate, the congress and the house are not representing the people only themselves, “them selfish selves…”
Great application of the 'domination translator' to current events! The domination was in the mandates and in the prohibition of questioning and discussion (which are the basis of actual science).
BRAVO for your steadfast courage in speaking Truth...and in 'piercing the veil' of darkness and vaporizing it, exposing the shadowy darkness that operates in secrecy, up until now.
Thanks for the heads up, Steve, with regard to some eyebrow-raising and chilling (not the hipster kind) stuff.
https://isps.yale.edu/research/publications/isps21-31
https://news.yale.edu/2021/11/29/unvaccinated-white-evangelicals-appear-immune-pro-vaccine-messaging
I always learn from your writings Steve, but want to quibble a bit about the preamble as a minimum requirement for a measure of “legitimacy.” The first draft of the preamble appears in James Wilson’s handwriting and he would certainly have approved of such a construction but he also took it for granted that to be legitimate any American government had to be bound under the law of nations—as he understood that law in other words as having to conform to the laws of nature and of Nature’s God—to respect the equal rights in accordance with the law of all peoples—including explicitly the peoples of the Native Nations over whom he said the United States has “no right.” I think it is that understanding that is necessary for there to be even a minimal claim to legitimacy. I think even that is inadequate as the true unwritten constitution of this land, in my opinion, is constituted by the international laws and usages that have been part of living with the land since millennia before the eurochristian invaders arrived and which the American people are bound to recognize and respect simply by virtue of living on Turtle Island. I realize that this position places me in something of a minority in American politics but I think there are more severe problems with any other approach with which I am familiar.
Thank you for this thoughtful piece.
I was just talking to someone who about the fact checkers always say, “No…this or that didn’t happen or isn’t the case” but then they just parade an assertion usually with no evidence of their story about what is the case. It is an information gestapo and in other countries under cybersecurity measures people are being jailed and abused.